little albert experiment summary

New Dabby

2 min read

·

09-12-2024

10

0

Share

The Little Albert Experiment: A Summary of a Controversial Study

John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner's Little Albert experiment, conducted in 1920, remains one of the most infamous and ethically questionable studies in the history of psychology. It aimed to demonstrate that classical conditioning could be used to create a phobia in a human subject. While the experiment yielded significant findings about the learning of fear, its lasting legacy is one of ethical debate and a call for stricter research guidelines.

The Subject: The subject was an infant, referred to as "Albert B," who was approximately nine months old at the start of the study. He was chosen because he exhibited a relatively calm temperament and showed little fear of the stimuli used in the experiment.

The Methodology: The researchers initially assessed Albert's reactions to a series of stimuli, including a white rat, a rabbit, a dog, a monkey, masks, and burning newspapers. Albert showed no fear response to any of these. The experiment then proceeded to condition a fear response.

The conditioning process involved pairing the presentation of the white rat (the neutral stimulus) with a loud, startling noise (the unconditioned stimulus) created by striking a steel bar behind Albert's head. This pairing consistently elicited a fear response (the unconditioned response) in Albert.

After several pairings, Albert began to exhibit a fear response (the conditioned response) solely to the presence of the white rat, even without the accompanying loud noise. This demonstrated the successful conditioning of a fear response.

Furthermore, the researchers observed stimulus generalization. Albert's conditioned fear response extended to other similar stimuli, such as a rabbit, a dog, and even a fur coat. This indicated that the learned fear wasn't specific to the white rat but generalized to objects sharing similar characteristics.

The Results and Conclusions: The experiment seemingly demonstrated that classical conditioning could be used to create a phobia. Watson and Rayner concluded that fears are learned rather than innate, a significant contribution to the behaviorist perspective at the time.

Ethical Concerns: The Little Albert experiment is widely criticized for its ethical shortcomings. The most significant concern is the lack of informed consent from both Albert and his mother. Moreover, the experiment induced a significant emotional distress in Albert, a clear violation of ethical principles. The researchers failed to decondition Albert's fear, leaving him with a potentially lasting phobia. The identity of Albert B. remained unknown for many years and the long-term effects of the experiment are unknown.

Legacy and Significance: Despite its ethical flaws, the Little Albert experiment remains a landmark study in psychology. It significantly influenced the understanding of classical conditioning and the development of phobias. However, its legacy serves as a potent reminder of the importance of ethical considerations in psychological research. Modern ethical guidelines for human subject research, emphasizing informed consent, minimize harm, and debriefing, are a direct result of critiques of studies like Little Albert's. The experiment highlights the critical need to balance scientific advancement with the ethical treatment of human participants.